Pipe Tapping

The AWWA National Tapping Competition is a competition of skill in which water operators from across North America work against the clock to open a cement-lined, ductile iron pipe and install a tap.

header purple

Page Content

Congratulations to the 2025 Winners!

PT 1st place women
Women’s Pipe Tapping

First Place: Grit City Grind, Tacoma Water, Pacific Northwest Section, 2:29:47 (Returning Champions)
Second Place: Alamo City Tappers, San Antonio Water Systems, Texas Section, 2:57:75
Third Place: Lansing Lethal Ladies, Michigan Section, 3:08:31

PT 1st place men
Men’s Pipe Tapping

First Place: Alamo Drillerz, Texas Section, 1:10:87
Second Place: BWWB Blue Team, Alabama-Mississippi Section, 1:16:38
Third Place: SADM Apodaca, Mexico Section, 1:17:31
Fourth Place: Michigan Tappers, Michigan Section, 1:22:82
Fifth Place: Big Blue Tappers, Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, Chesapeake Section, 1:32:21

View Full Final Results

Thank You to Our 2026 Sponsors

DIPRA-logo mcwane-logo
2025

Pipe Tapping Highlights

ACE25-pipe-tapping-0004
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0007
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0009
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0010
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0011
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0001
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0012
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0003
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0014
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0013
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0016
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0008
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0002
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0005
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0015
ACE25-pipe-tapping-0006

FAQ

Pipe Tapping Rules

What is the AWWA National Pipe Tapping Competition?

The AWWA National Tapping Competition is a competition of skill in which water operators from across North America work against the clock to open a cement-lined, ductile iron pipe and install a tap.

The competition begins at the local AWWA Section level and the winners are then eligible to compete in the national Tapping Competition. There are two divisions, Men’s and Women’s.

Where is the Tapping Competition held?

The event is held during the AWWA’s Annual Conference & Exposition (ACE) in June every year.

May anyone enter the Competition?

All team members must be an individual, active, operations member of AWWA or a regular employee of a utility member or organization member. Each participating team represents an AWWA Section.

Help! My Section’s competition occurs after the registration deadline. Can my team still register for the Competition?

The contest coordinators realize that your Section normally sends a team. But do not wait until you have determined whether or not you are able to travel and have completed your hotel and airline reservations. Because of signage, supplies and other information, make contest registration your top priority. It is free and only takes a minute or two. To register contact competitions@awwa.org to confirm your eligibility and obtain access to the registration link.

How may I become a member of AWWA?

Visit our Membership page for more details:

Join AWWA

My team won our Section’s Tapping Competition. How do we enroll in the ACE competition?

Contact competitions@awwa.org to confirm your eligibility and obtain access to the registration link. You do not need to register for ACE to participate in the Tapping Competition. However, if your team members would like to attend professional sessions or other activities associated with the conference, registration is necessary.

Is there a cut-off date to enter the Tapping Competition?

Yes. Please register as soon as possible. Signage is prepared the first week in May and the preliminaries schedule is created.

Our Section contest is later than the cut-off date. Can we still enter our team?

Please notify the AWWA Staff Coordinator of your delayed registration needs as soon as possible.

What are the prizes?

The winning men’s and women’s teams each receive trophies and the four team members expenses are paid to return to defend their titles at the next AWWA Annual Conference & Exposition.

Can a team member’s spouse, family, or guest obtain a complimentary badge to enter the Exhibit Hall for my competition?

Each competitor is allotted one complimentary badge. Children 12 and under receive free admission when accompanied by an adult.

What’s the national record for the fastest tapping team?

The national record is 1:01.95 set by the San Antonio, Texas team in 1994.

Our team is made up of two men and two women. Is there a “Co-Ed Division”?

When the Women’s Division was first set up, it was decided that all co-ed teams would compete with the men’s teams, so that is where your team must register.

May my team bring a tapping machine to the Pipe Tapping Contest?

No. In all fairness, the teams must use the equipment provided on site.

Our team won the national Tapping Competition. How are our expenses reimbursed to return for next year’s competition?

You must complete an official AWWA Expense Form and submit your receipts. To receive a form by email, contact the AWWA Staff Coordinator. Further information on covered expenses will be provided with the Reimbursement Policy and Form.

Is your company interested in providing InKind materials for a competition?

Please complete the attached InKind Material Sponsor Expression of Interest Form. Completed forms can be sent to the Competition Coordinator. 

Sponsor Interest Form

Hall of Fame

2025 Men’s

1st Place: Alamo Drillerz, Texas Section, 1:10:87
2nd Place: BWWB Blue Team, Alabama-Mississippi Section, 1:16:38
3rd Place: SADM Apodaca, Mexico Section, 1:17:31
4th Place: Michigan Tappers, Michigan Section, 1:22:82
5th Place: Big Blue Tappers, Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, Chesapeake Section, 1:32:21

2025 Women’s

1st Place: Grit City Grind, Tacoma Water, Pacific Northwest Section, 2:29:47 (Returning Champions)
2nd Place: Alamo City Tappers, San Antonio Water Systems, Texas Section, 2:57:75
3rd Place: Lansing Lethal Ladies, Michigan Section, 3:08:31

2024 Men’s

1st Place: Servicios de Agua y Drenaje de Monterrey Apodaca, Mexico Section, 1:21.65
2nd Place: Birmingham Water Works Board, Alabama/Mississippi Section, 1:27.68
3rd Place: Big Blue Tappers, Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, Chesapeake Section, 1:30.03
4th Place: Denver Water, Rocky Mountain Section, 1:42.79
5th Place: Beaufort Jasper Water and Sewer Authority, South Carolina Section, 1:49.63

2024 Women’s

1st Place: Grit City Grind, Tacoma Water, Pacific Northwest Section, 2:24.72
2nd Place: Big D Lady Tappers, Dallas Water Utilities, Texas Section, 2:25.97
3rd Place: Alamo City Tappers, San Antonio Water Systems, Texas Section, 2:28.22

2023 Men’s

1st Place : SADM Apodaca, Mexico 1:15:19
2nd Place: Alamo Drillerz, Texas 1:21:50
3rd Place: Denver Water Men’s Tapping, Rocky Mountain 1:29:34

2023 Women’s

1st Place: Big “D” Lady Tappers, Texas 1:59:15
2nd Place: Grit City Grind, Pacific Northwest 2:26:41
3rd Place: Lansing Lethal Ladies, Michigan 2:53:13

2022 Men’s

1st Place: SADM Apodaca, Mexico
2nd Place: Bama Boys, Alabama/Mississippi
3rd Place: Alamo Drillers, Texas 

2022 Women’s

1st Place: Big “D” Lady Tappers, Texas
2nd Place: Lady Bandits, Texas
3rd Place: Lansing Lethal Ladies, Michigan 

2019 Men’s

 

1st Place: Bama Boyz, Alabama-Mississippi, 1:08.56
2nd Place: SAD Apodaca, Mexico 1:12.06
3rd Place: SADM Nicolas, Mexico 1:16.85 

 

2019 Women’s

1st Place: Big “D” Lady Tappers, Texas, 1:58.82
2nd Place: Lansing Lethal Ladies, Michigan 2:12.25
3rd Place: Alamo City Tappers, Texas 2:13.72

2018 Men’s

1st Place: Birmingham (Ala.) Water Works, 1:16:34
2nd Place: SADM Apodaca, 1:18.0
3rd Place: Spotsylvania County (Pa.) Utilities, 1:19.85
4th Place: SADM Guadalupe, 1:20.65 

2018 Women’s

1st Place: Big D Lady Tappers, Dallas Water Utilities, 2:26.38
2nd Place: Lansing (Mich) Board of Water & Light, 2:30.28
3rd Place: Pretty Tough Tappers, City of Raleigh, N.C. Public Utilities, 2:50.65
4th Place: Spotsylvania, 1:20.25
5th Place: Birmingham Water Works Board, 1:39.63 

2017 Men’s

1st Place: SADM Apodaca, SADM Monterrey, Mexico, 1:16.91
2nd Place: SADM San Miguel, SADM Monterrey, Mexico, 1:21.22
3rd Place: Birmingham Water Works, 1:21.62
4th Place: Silver State Tappers, Las Vegas Valley Water District, 1:23.03
5th Place: Spotsylvania County Utilities, 1:37.03 

2017 Women’s

1st Place: Lansing Lethal Ladies, Lansing Board of Water & Light, 2:23.25
2nd Place: Smooth Operators, City of Troy, Mich., 2:40.09
3rd Place: Ductile Iron Divas, Greater Cincinnati Water Works, 3:06.78 

2016 Men’s

1st Place: SADM Monterrey, Apodaca, Monterrey, Mexico 1:07:47
2nd Place: Spotsylvania, Fredericksburg, Virginia 1:12:69
3rd Place: Birmingham Water Works Board, Birmingham, Alabama; 1:19:94
4th Place: Smoking Bits, City of Concord, North Carolina, 1:26:25
5th Place: Tacoma Water Pipe Tapping Team, City of Tacoma, Washington; 2:05:78 

2016 Women’s

1st Place: Lansing Lethal Ladies, Lansing, Michigan; 2:42:65
2nd Place: Smooth Operators, City of Troy, Michigan; 2:44:72
3rd Place: Denver (Women) Water Tapping, Denver, Colorado; 2:51:12 

2015 Men’s

1st Place: SADM Monterrey, Apodaca, Monterrey, Mexico 1:11:97
2nd Place: Spotsylvania, Fredericksburg, Virginia 1:12:85
3rd Place: SADM San Miguel, Monterrey, Mexico; 1:15:50
4th Place: Greenwood Tappers, Greenwood, South Carolina, 1:21:90
5th Place: Denver Water Men’s Tapping, Denver, Colorado; 1:33:56 

2015 Women’s

1st Place: Lansing Lethal Ladies; Lansing, Michigan; 2:35:87
2nd Place: GCWW Ductile Iron Divas, Cincinnati, Ohio; 2:48:34
3rd Place: Denver (women) Water Tapping, Denver, Colorado; 3:06:95 

2014 Men’s

1st Place: SADM San Miguel; Agua Y Drenoje; 1:09:53
2nd Place: Birmingham Water Works; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:20:78
3rd Place: SADM San Nicholas; Agua Drenaje Monterrey, Mexico; 1:27:29
4th Place: Ottawa “Main”-iac Tappers; City of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 1:27:78
5th Place: United Water Idaho; Boise, Idaho; 1:48:85 

2014 Women’s

1st Place: Lansing Lethal Ladies; Lansing, Michigan; 2:28:06
2nd Place: SAWS Alamo City Tappers; San Antonio, Texas; 2:45:78
3rd Place: Greater Cincinnati Water Works – Ductile Iron Divas; Cincinnati, Ohio; 3:09:65 

2013 Men’s

1st Place: Birmingham Water Works Board; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:12:09
2nd Place: Four Jokers; Las Vegas, Nevada; 1:12:47
3rd Place: SADM Monterrey Apodaca; Mexico; 1:19:34
4th Place: Spotsylvania County; Fredericksburg, Virginia; 1:20:19
5th Place: SAWS South Texas; San Antonio, Texas; 1:20:72

2013 Women’s

1st Place: SAWS Alamo City Tappers; San Antonio, Texas; 2:23:81
2nd Place: Lansing Lethal Ladies; Lansing, Michigan; 2:32:06
3rd Place: Greater Cincinnati; Cincinnati, Ohio; 3:20:002012 in Dallas, Texas 

2012 Men’s

1st Place: Birmingham, Alabama Water; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:10:22
2nd Place: Spotsylvania County; Fredericksburg, Virginia; 1:15:69
3rd Place: SADM Monterrey; Mexico; 1:21:78 

2012 Women’s

1st Place: SAWS Alamo City Tappers, San Antonio, Texas; 2:04:29
2nd Place: Honolulu Water Supply, Honolulu, Hawaii: 2:10:41
3rd Place: Michigan Ladies; Lansing, Michigan; 2:25:87

2011 Men’s

1st Place: Spotsylvania County, Fredericksburg, Virginia; 1:09:16
2nd Place: SADM Monterrey; Mexico; 1:10:93
3rd Place: Birmingham, Alabama Water; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:19:35
4th Place: SADM Apodaca; Mexico; 1:24:12
5th Place: Tacoma Tapping Team; Tacoma, Washington; 1:41:72 

2011 Women’s

1st Place: Honolulu Board of Water Supply Wahines, Honolulu, Hawaii; 2:35:18
2nd Place: Cleveland Ladies of the Lake; Cleveland, Ohio; 2:41:57
3rd Place: Alamo Tappers, San Antonio, Texas; 2:52:17

2010 Men’s

1st Place: Birmingham Water Works Board; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:14:00 2nd Place: Spotsylvania County Utilities; Spotsylvania, Virginia; 1:17:31
3rd Place: SAWS Men; San Antonio, Texas; 1:21:75
4th Place: Tacoma Water Men’s; Tacoma, Washington; 1:28:19 5th Place: City of Ottawa; Ontario, Canada; 1:41:47

2010 Women’s

1st Place: Honolulu Board of Water Supply Wahines; Honolulu, Hawaii; 2:12:47
2nd Place: Alamo City Tappers; San Antonio, Texas; 2:19:72
3rd Place: Bexarmet Office Girls; San Antonio, Texas; 2:37:47

2009 Men’s

1st Place: Tacoma Water Men’s; Tacoma, Washington; 1:13:38
2nd Place: Columbus Water; Columbus, Ohio; 1:13:69
3rd Place: SAWS Men; San Antonio, Texas; 1:17:41
4th Place: Spotsylvania County Utilities; Spotsylvania, Virginia; 1:22:44
5th Place: Birmingham Water Works Board; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:2:81

2009 Women’s

1st Place: Alamo City Tappers; San Antonio, Texas; 2:00:88
2nd Place: Honolulu Board of Water Supply; Honolulu, Hawaii; 2:09:37
3rd Place: Sassy Taps; Portland, Oregon; 2:24:75

2008 Men’s

1st Place: Columbus Water; Columbus, Ohio; 1:22:90
2nd Place: Four Jokers; Las Vegas, Nevada; 1:23:31
3rd Place: Birmingham Water Works Board; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:23:44 4th Place: SAWS Men’s; San Antonio, Texas; 1:24:93
5th Place: Volunteer Tappers; Maryville, Tennessee; 1:32:38

2008 Women’s

1st Place: Sassy Taps; Portland, Oregon; 2:13:97
2nd Place: Nitro Bits; 2:47:06
3rd Place: SAWS Women’s; San Antonio, Texas; 2:54:50

2007 Men’s

1st Place: Columbus Water; Columbus, Ohio; 1:17.06
2nd Place: Birmingham Water & Sewer, Birmingham, Alabama; 1:23.66
3rd Place: Troy Tappers; Troy, Michigan; 1:25.88
4th Place: Rockwood PUD; Canby, Oregon; 1:29.81
5th Place: Portland Hole Hawgs; 1:36.25

2007 Women’s

1st Place: SAWS Ladies Team; San Antonio, Texas; 1:54.75
2nd Place: Nitro Bits; Happy Valley, Oregon; 2:12.87
3rd Place: Girls on Tap; Palmdale, California 2:49.04

2006 Men’s

1st Place: Birmingham Water & Sewer: Birmingham, Alabama: 1:13.15
2nd Place: Spotsylvania County, Virginia: 1:16.91
3rd Place: Four Jokers, Las Vegas, Nevada: 1:17.25
4th Place: Honolulu, Hawaii Men: 1:23.56
5th Place: Troy Tappers: Michigan: 1:34.03

2006 Women’s

1st Place: Nitro Bits: Sunrise Water Authority, Oregon: 2:01.03
2nd Place: Na Wahine Oka Wai: Honolulu, Hawaii: 2:05.93
3rd Place: SAWS Women: San Antonio, Texas: 3:52.34
4th Place: Pipe Dreams: Ft. Thomas, Kentucky: 4:25.43

2005 Men’s

1st Place: Birmingham Water & Sewer; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:20.15
2nd Place: Northwest Oregon; Portland, Oregon; 1:28.15
3rd Place: City of Ottawa Water Division; Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 1:35.28
4th Place: San Antonio Water System; San Antonio, Texas; 1:39.06
5th Place: Troy Tapping Team; Troy, Michigan; 1:39.31

2005 Women’s

1st Place: Na Wahine Oka Wai; Honolulu, Hawaii; 1:50.41
2nd Place: Three Queens and a Joker; Las Vegas, Nevada; 2:23.10
3rd Place: Louisville Water Tappers; Louisville, Kentucky; 2:24.63
4th Place: Nitro Bits; Sunrise Water Authority, Oregon; 2:28.72
5th Place: Tapi-Okies; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; 02:37.06

2004 Men’s

1st Place: Birmingham Water & Sewer; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:15.96
2nd Place: San Antonio Water System; San Antonio, Texas; 1:18.91
3rd Place: City of Ottawa Water Division; Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 1:30.09
4th Place: Northwest Oregon – Men; 1:32.78
5th Place: Elm City Tappers – Men; 1:35.88

2004 Women’s

1st Place: Louisville Water Co.; Louisville, Kentucky; 1:53.00
2nd Place: Na Wahine Oka Wai; Hawaii; 1:55.37
3rd Place: No Pressure; Las Vegas, Nevada; 2:26.34

2003 Men’s

1st Place: Northwest Oregon; Portland, Oregon; 1:21.15
2nd Place: Elm City Tappers; New Haven, Connecticut; 1:22:46
3rd Place: Birmingham Water & Sewer; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:26.69
4th Place: Honolulu Board of Water Supply; Honolulu, Hawaii; 1:30.44
5th Place: City of Ottawa Water Division; Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 1:42.91

2002 Men’s

1st Place: Pipe Tapping Team #1; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:18.46
2nd Place: Lansing Board of Water & Light; Lansing, Michigan; 1:24.23
3rd Place: Elm City Tappers; New Haven, Connecticut; 1:29.77
4th Place: City of Ottawa Water Division; Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 1:42.79
5th Place: Fairfax County Water Authority; Merrifield, Virginia; 1:50.59

2002 Women’s

1st Place: Louisville Water Co.; Louisville, Kentucky; 2:08.88
2nd Place: Honolulu Board of Water Supply; Honolulu, Hawaii; 2:16.65
3rd Place: Lansing Board of Water & Light; Lansing, Michigan; 2:30.34

2001 Men’s

1st Place: Pipe Tapping Team #1; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:12.00
2nd Place: Lansing Board of Water & Light; Lansing, Michigan; 1:32.00 (?)
3rd Place: Powell Valley Water District; Washington; 1:26.06
4th Place: Fairfax County Water Authority Tap Team; Virginia; 1:33.38
5th Place: Columbus Tapping Team; Columbus, Ohio; 1:37.60

2001 Women’s

1st Place: Mililani Leak Detection; Honolulu, Hawaii; 2:00.47
2nd Place: Louisville, Kentucky; 2:10.90
3rd Place: Lansing Board of Water & Light; Lansing, Michigan; 2:27.59

2000 Men’s

1st Place: Birmingham Water Works; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:06.77
2nd Place: Honolulu Board of Water Supply; Honolulu, Hawaii; 1:03.00 (?)
3rd Place: Elm City Tappers, Connecticut; 1:15.82

2000 Women’s

1st Place: Louisville Water Co.; Louisville, Kentucky; 2:05.95

1999 Men’s

1st Place: Honolulu Board of Water Supply; Honolulu, Hawaii; 1:07.73
2nd Place: San Antonio Water System, San Antonio Texas; 1:08.58

1998 Men’s

1st Place: Honolulu Board of Water Supply; Honolulu, Hawaii; 1:15.53
2nd Place: Birmingham Water Works; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:16.83
3rd Place: Reg. Munic. of Ottawa; Carleton, Ottawa, Canada; 1:21.27
4th Place: San Antonio, TX 1997 Champions (Practice); 1:32.83
5th Place: Corpus Christi Water Div.; Corpus Christi, Texas; 1:30.63

1998 Women’s

1st Place: Water & Wastewater Utilities, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; 2:42.20

1997 Men’s

1st Place: San Antonio, Texas; 1:04.78
2nd Place: Birmingham Water Works; Birmingham, Alabama, 1:07.51
3rd Place: Mount Pleasant, North Carolina; 1:16.71
4th Place: Honolulu, Hawaii; 1:25.94
5th Place: Miami Dade, Miami, Florida; 1:44.09

1996 Men’s

1st Place: Birmingham Water Works Board; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:14.12
2nd Place: San Antonio Water System – #1, Texas; 1:14.35;
3rd Place: San Antonio Water System; 95 Champs, Texas; 1:17.24
4th Place: Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power; Los Angeles, California 1:21.46
5th Place: Vancouver Water Department; Vancouver, Washington; 1:40.64

1995

1st Place: San Antonio Water Board; San Antonio, Texas; 1:21.69
2nd Place: Birmingham Water and Sewer District; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:24.21
3rd Place: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; Los Angeles, California 1:26.95
4th Place: Honolulu Board of Water Supply, Honolulu, Hawaii 1:37.38
5th Place: Las Vegas Valley Water District, Las Vegas, Nevada 1:40.61

1994 Men’s

1st Place: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; Los Angeles, California; 1:07.21
2nd Place: Honolulu Board of Water Supply; Honolulu, Hawaii; 1:07.81
3rd Place: East Bay Municipal Utility District; Oakland, California; 1:15.08
4th Place: Tualatin Valley Water District; Beaverton, Oregon; 1:17.76
5th Place: Vancouver Water Department; Vancouver, Washington; 1:25.08

1993 Men’s

1st Place: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; Los Angeles, California; 1:07.21
2nd Place: Honolulu Board of Water Supply; Honolulu, Hawaii; 1:07.81
3rd Place: East Bay Municipal Utility District; Oakland, California; 1:15.08
4th Place: Tualatin Valley Water District; Beaverton, Oregon; 1:17.76
5th Place: Vancouver Water Department; Vancouver, Washington; 1:25.08

1992 Men’s

1st Place: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; Los Angeles, California; 1:11.50
2nd Place: Lansing Board of Water & Light; Lansing, Michigan; 1:18.67
3rd Place: Dallas Water Utilities; Dallas, Texas; 1:27.85
4th Place: Birmingham Water Works & Sewer Board; Birmingham, Alabama; 1:29.84
5th Place: Spartanburg Water District; Spartanburg, South Carolina; 1:38.25

1991 Men’s

1st Place: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; Los Angeles, California; 1:11.40
2nd Place: East Bay Municipal Utility District; Oakland, California; 1:17.69
3rd Place: Bangor Water District; Bangor, Maine; 1:28.03
4th Place: Soos Creek Water & Sewer District; Renton, Washington; 1:29.01
5th Place: Birmingham Water Works & Sewer Board; Birmingham, Alabama; 2:12.75

1990 Men’s

1st Place: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; Los Angeles, California; 1:17.67
2nd Place: East Bay Municipal Utility District; Oakland, California; 1:29.58
3rd Place: Spartanburg Water System; South Carolina; 1:31.69
4th Place: Dallas Water Utilities; Dallas, Texas; 1:37.76
5th Place: Salt Lake City Public Utilities; Salt Lake City, Utah; 1:48.85

1989 Men’s

1st Place: East Bay Municipal Utility District; Oakland, California; 1:20.22
2nd Place: Los Angeles Department of Water & Power; Los Angeles, California; 1:27.47
3rd Place: East Bay Municipal Utility District #2 Team; Oakland, California; 1:39.53
4th Place: SW Pennsylvania Water Authority; Jefferson, Pennsylvania; 1:55.02
5th Place: Hackensack Water Company; Hackensack, New Jersey; 2:03.22

1988 Men’s

1st Place: SW Pennsylvania Water Authority; Jefferson, Pennsylvania; 1:51.55
2nd Place: Vancouver Water Department; Vancouver, Washington; 2:09.76
3rd Place: Denver Water Department; Denver, Colorado; 2:20.43
4th Place: Wichita Water Department; Wichita, Kansas; 2:20.63
5th Place: Lima Water Department; Lima, Ohio; 2:28.23

1986 Men’s

1st Place: Lima Water Department; Lima, Ohio; 2:44
2nd Place: Denver Water Department; Denver, Colorado; 2:47
2nd Place: Southwest Pennsylvania Water Authority; Jefferson, Pennsylvania; 2:47

Load More

AWWA specifically does not endorse products manufactured by sponsors and takes no position concerning the adequacy of such products or their compliance with any AWWA Standard.